The Relationship of Organizing the Martyrs' Cemetery and Promoting the Culture of Sacrifice and Martyrdom between the Families of Martyrs and Non-Martyrs in Hamadan Province in 1393

Authors

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate "the relationship between organizing the martyrs' cemetery and promoting the culture of sacrifice and martyrdom between the families of Martyrs and non Martyrs in Hamadan province". The method of this research is cross-sectional survey. The population is the families of Martyrs and non Martyrs in Hamadan province, using the Cochran formula, 768 persons as the sample (384 Martyrs families, and 384 from other segments of the people) selected using stratified random sampling of the population. The instrument used in this study is questionnaire. The validity method used to obtain the content validity and Cronbach's alpha is used to measure reliability (alpha of the questionnaire = 94/0 percent). After data collection, data analysis was performed with SPSS computer software. In the description aspect, one-dimensional tables, frequency, percentage column, standard deviation and graphs were used and also in the inferential aspect, Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA were used to test the hypothesis. The results show that there is a meaningful relationship between the dependent variable (the promotion of the culture of sacrifice and martyrdom) and the main independent variable (Organizing the Martyrs' Cemetery) which means that the culture of sacrifice and martyrdom will be promoted by organizing the martyrs' cemetery and the view of the people will change into positive.

Keywords


20. Alpert, Harry. (1961). Emile Durkhiem and his Sociology, NewYork: Russell & Russell. 21. Andrew Whitmarsh, 2000, MEMORY AND COMMEMORATION IN WAR MUSEUMS, Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY,United Kingdom. 22. Baron, R.A., & Byrne, D. (1992). Social psychology:Understanding human interaction (6th ed. ). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 23. Burdge, Rabel. (2002) Why is Social Impact Assessment the Orphan of the Assessment Process?, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. Vol.20, NO.1,Pp.3-9 24. Bordens, Kenneth S. Horowitz, Irwin A. (2002). Social Psychology. Second edition, By lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Publishers. 25. Clayton, S. Myers, G. (2009). Consumption Psychology. ltd., Publication Wiley Blackwell. 26. Deaux, K. (1998). Social identity. In J. Worrell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender (Vol. 2) San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 27. Geert Hofstede, Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, Focused Issue: Is Management Science International?, (Jan., 1994), pp. 4-13 28. Schein, Edgar (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 29. Udehn, L. (2001). Methodological Individualism; Background, history and meaning. London:Routledge 30. Tittle, Charles R. and Michael R. Welch (1983). Religiosity and Dissertation, Essex University. 31. Rutten, Geert. Kremers, Stef. Rutten, Steven. Harting, Janneke. (2009). "A theory-based cross-sectional survey demonstrated the important role of awareness in guideline implementation". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62, PP. 167-176. www.elsevier.com. 32. Taylor, Shelley E. Peplau, Letitia Anne. Sears, David O. (1997). Social Psychology. Ninth edition, By Prentice- Hall, Inc. 33. Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1970). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-203). 34. Myers N. (1988). Threatened biotas: “Hot spots” intropical forests. The Environmentalist 35. Vanclay, Frank. (2003). “International Principles for Social Impact Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 21, No. 1, Pp. 5-11. 36. Vanclay, Frank. (2003). “Conceptual and Methodological Advances in Social Impact Assessment”. In Becker &Vanclay, Pp. 1-9. 37. www.CWgc.org website(2011). 38. www. wikipedia.org(2013). 39. 9.Glaeser & Laibson & Sacerdote(2002). "An Economic Approach to Social capital", in "Economic Journal", no.112. 10.Hopkin